[Arm-dev] a plague farm ?

[Troy Dawson]

My votes
kernel: 4.0.0.-*.f22 (The current fedora f22 4.0.0 kernel)
uboot: 2015.04

Why?
uboot 2015.4 had some major improvements over 2015.02 (I'm really hoping it
makes it into f22 final)
kernel - well, I actually want 4.1.0 because it will have support for my
pcDuino3 Nano ... but 4.0.0 is currently close enough.

I feel more strongly about uboot 2015.04 than I do about the kernel.

Troy


On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 04/29/2015 01:06 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 04/29/2015 10:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>  Please clear up one thing for me...
>>>
>>> What uboot and kernel will be used for this?  One message seemed to
>>> imply that the building would be F19 based.
>>>
>>>  From my work with F19 on my cubies and f21 and F22, I really want the
>>> current uboot and kernel, as multiple board support really works now,
>>> compared to how it was with F19.
>>>
>>
>> I'm fine with moving forward. Initially Howard and I had talked about
>> using a 3.18 or 3.19 base for long term support, but as ARMv8 matures it
>> might be better to use a newer kernel. Currently I'm building against
>> kernel-4.0.0-1.fc23.src.rpm as a base.
>>
>>
>> Would that be acceptable for everyone?
>>
>
> I am assuming that is close enough to 4.0.0-1.f22 for me to say yes.
>
> But what uboot?  2015.02 is the current in f22, with looking like 2015.04
> will be what ships.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20150430/70cccfa1/attachment.html>