My votes kernel: 4.0.0.-*.f22 (The current fedora f22 4.0.0 kernel) uboot: 2015.04 Why? uboot 2015.4 had some major improvements over 2015.02 (I'm really hoping it makes it into f22 final) kernel - well, I actually want 4.1.0 because it will have support for my pcDuino3 Nano ... but 4.0.0 is currently close enough. I feel more strongly about uboot 2015.04 than I do about the kernel. Troy On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > On 04/29/2015 01:06 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> >> On 04/29/2015 10:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> Please clear up one thing for me... >>> >>> What uboot and kernel will be used for this? One message seemed to >>> imply that the building would be F19 based. >>> >>> From my work with F19 on my cubies and f21 and F22, I really want the >>> current uboot and kernel, as multiple board support really works now, >>> compared to how it was with F19. >>> >> >> I'm fine with moving forward. Initially Howard and I had talked about >> using a 3.18 or 3.19 base for long term support, but as ARMv8 matures it >> might be better to use a newer kernel. Currently I'm building against >> kernel-4.0.0-1.fc23.src.rpm as a base. >> >> >> Would that be acceptable for everyone? >> > > I am assuming that is close enough to 4.0.0-1.f22 for me to say yes. > > But what uboot? 2015.02 is the current in f22, with looking like 2015.04 > will be what ships. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20150430/70cccfa1/attachment-0006.html>