[Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy

Jim Perrin jperrin at centos.org
Tue Aug 4 10:24:39 UTC 2015


I haven't, no. I'm in Cambridge this week so my free time is a bit limited.
Next week you'll have my full attention.
On Aug 4, 2015 10:08, "Lomovtsev, Vadim" <Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com>
wrote:

> Have you moved to 4.2-rc3 ? If so there would be some minor conflict
> (apart from 4.2-rc2) which I could help to address.
> Just in case - I've prepared patches for 4.2-rc2.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf
> of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 7:21 PM
> To: arm-dev at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy
>
> I ran into a couple applying the patchset, but I think this is mostly
> solvable, and due to the fact that we don't have the kernel in git yet
> for common patching/updates. I'll play around with it a bit more this
> afternoon.
>
> On 07/30/2015 05:03 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Were you able to apply patches and test them?
> > Are there any issues ? if so please let me know...
> >
> > WBR,
> > Vadim
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf
> of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>
> > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 3:58 PM
> > To: arm-dev at centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy
> >
> > Overall, it will be easier when we have this alternate kernel plumbed
> > into git and patches/pull requests can be done directly against the
> > repo. I'll pull your patches a bit later today and try them out.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 07/27/2015 06:09 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote:
> >> Yes, but not sure if did this in right way.
> >> I've updated config-arm64 with new options and was able to build rpms.
> >>
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on
> behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 10:03 PM
> >> To: arm-dev at centos.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy
> >>
> >> Sorry, I've been out at OSCON this week with somewhat limited
> >> connectivity. Were you able to get this sorted?
> >>
> >> On 07/22/2015 11:23 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote:
> >>> I'm trying to rebuild kernel rpm but it fails due to new options in
> .config has been added, any help with that would be much appreciated?
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________________
> >>> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on
> behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>
> >>> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:03 PM
> >>> To: arm-dev at centos.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy
> >>>
> >>> I've currently working on a kernel build that's based off the fedora
> >>> tree. The commit hash I'm building from there is
> >>>
> >>> 228ccc4defbda4317b06d561e5fb532c774fe2e2
> >>>
> >>> My changes are mostly to the spec file, and the removal of the kdbus
> >>> patches. You can find the src.rpm for my kernel at ->
> >>>
> http://people.centos.org/jperrin/kernels/kernel-4.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1.centos.el7.src.rpm
> >>>
> >>> I have a bit more specfile cleanup to do here, but it will work to
> patch
> >>> against.
> >>>
> >>> On 07/17/2015 08:53 AM, Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> We have some set of patches for our processor (Cavium Thunderx) and
> would like
> >>>> to add them to CentOS kernel for the time while they are being
> submitted into
> >>>> mainline.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there any set policy for submitting patches to be included into
> CentOS
> >>>> kernel? And which kernel version/commit I should base my changes on?
> >>>>
> >>>> Vadim
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Arm-dev mailing list
> >>>> Arm-dev at centos.org
> >>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jim Perrin
> >>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> >>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Arm-dev mailing list
> >>> Arm-dev at centos.org
> >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Arm-dev mailing list
> >>> Arm-dev at centos.org
> >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Perrin
> >> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> >> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Arm-dev mailing list
> >> Arm-dev at centos.org
> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Arm-dev mailing list
> >> Arm-dev at centos.org
> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Jim Perrin
> > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
> > _______________________________________________
> > Arm-dev mailing list
> > Arm-dev at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Arm-dev mailing list
> > Arm-dev at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> >
>
> --
> Jim Perrin
> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20150804/238e140d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Arm-dev mailing list