I haven't, no. I'm in Cambridge this week so my free time is a bit limited. Next week you'll have my full attention. On Aug 4, 2015 10:08, "Lomovtsev, Vadim" <Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > Have you moved to 4.2-rc3 ? If so there would be some minor conflict > (apart from 4.2-rc2) which I could help to address. > Just in case - I've prepared patches for 4.2-rc2. > > ________________________________________ > From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf > of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 7:21 PM > To: arm-dev at centos.org > Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy > > I ran into a couple applying the patchset, but I think this is mostly > solvable, and due to the fact that we don't have the kernel in git yet > for common patching/updates. I'll play around with it a bit more this > afternoon. > > On 07/30/2015 05:03 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > > > Were you able to apply patches and test them? > > Are there any issues ? if so please let me know... > > > > WBR, > > Vadim > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf > of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> > > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 3:58 PM > > To: arm-dev at centos.org > > Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy > > > > Overall, it will be easier when we have this alternate kernel plumbed > > into git and patches/pull requests can be done directly against the > > repo. I'll pull your patches a bit later today and try them out. > > > > > > > > On 07/27/2015 06:09 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: > >> Yes, but not sure if did this in right way. > >> I've updated config-arm64 with new options and was able to build rpms. > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on > behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> > >> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 10:03 PM > >> To: arm-dev at centos.org > >> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy > >> > >> Sorry, I've been out at OSCON this week with somewhat limited > >> connectivity. Were you able to get this sorted? > >> > >> On 07/22/2015 11:23 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: > >>> I'm trying to rebuild kernel rpm but it fails due to new options in > .config has been added, any help with that would be much appreciated? > >>> > >>> ________________________________________ > >>> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on > behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> > >>> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:03 PM > >>> To: arm-dev at centos.org > >>> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy > >>> > >>> I've currently working on a kernel build that's based off the fedora > >>> tree. The commit hash I'm building from there is > >>> > >>> 228ccc4defbda4317b06d561e5fb532c774fe2e2 > >>> > >>> My changes are mostly to the spec file, and the removal of the kdbus > >>> patches. You can find the src.rpm for my kernel at -> > >>> > http://people.centos.org/jperrin/kernels/kernel-4.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1.centos.el7.src.rpm > >>> > >>> I have a bit more specfile cleanup to do here, but it will work to > patch > >>> against. > >>> > >>> On 07/17/2015 08:53 AM, Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com wrote: > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> We have some set of patches for our processor (Cavium Thunderx) and > would like > >>>> to add them to CentOS kernel for the time while they are being > submitted into > >>>> mainline. > >>>> > >>>> Is there any set policy for submitting patches to be included into > CentOS > >>>> kernel? And which kernel version/commit I should base my changes on? > >>>> > >>>> Vadim > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Arm-dev mailing list > >>>> Arm-dev at centos.org > >>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jim Perrin > >>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > >>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Arm-dev mailing list > >>> Arm-dev at centos.org > >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Arm-dev mailing list > >>> Arm-dev at centos.org > >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Jim Perrin > >> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > >> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Arm-dev mailing list > >> Arm-dev at centos.org > >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Arm-dev mailing list > >> Arm-dev at centos.org > >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > >> > > > > -- > > Jim Perrin > > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > > _______________________________________________ > > Arm-dev mailing list > > Arm-dev at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Arm-dev mailing list > > Arm-dev at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > > > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20150804/238e140d/attachment-0006.html>