Lets do one large patchset if that's the count. It'll be easier to deal with at that point. On 08/11/2015 12:40 PM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: > Yes, that would work. I'll prepare patchet based on 4.2-rc5 shortly. > Thanks a lot. > Are there new srpm for me to pick up and test ? I'd like to have a option to test patches at my side prior to sending them... > And one more thing - should I sent patches all-in-one or separate each of them to be available/reviewed at mailist? > There ill be about 80 patches in total. > > ________________________________________ > From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 7:19 PM > To: arm-dev at centos.org > Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy > > We could pick a 4.2-rc5 fedora git hash to rebase to if that's easier > for you. This would be fairly close to the vanilla upstream since I'm > removing the kdbus patches. > > Would that work for you? > > On 08/11/2015 09:15 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: >> Hi Jim, >> >> >> We've prepared more changes in order to support thunderx but changes are based at 4.2-rc5 version. To update kernel from 4.2-rc2 to 4.2-rc5 it would take huge bunch of patches. I've rebase them to rc2 fedora tree and tested with kernel you provided (build rpms and so on). No issues so far. >> >> >> Would it be possible to apply them onto your kernel or I should rebase them to rc2 (which could be painfull) or other version ? >> >> >> Vadim >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 1:24 PM >> To: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware >> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy >> >> >> I haven't, no. I'm in Cambridge this week so my free time is a bit limited. Next week you'll have my full attention. >> >> On Aug 4, 2015 10:08, "Lomovtsev, Vadim" <Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com<mailto:Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com>> wrote: >> Have you moved to 4.2-rc3 ? If so there would be some minor conflict (apart from 4.2-rc2) which I could help to address. >> Just in case - I've prepared patches for 4.2-rc2. >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org>> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org<mailto:jperrin at centos.org>> >> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 7:21 PM >> To: arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev at centos.org> >> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy >> >> I ran into a couple applying the patchset, but I think this is mostly >> solvable, and due to the fact that we don't have the kernel in git yet >> for common patching/updates. I'll play around with it a bit more this >> afternoon. >> >> On 07/30/2015 05:03 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Were you able to apply patches and test them? >>> Are there any issues ? if so please let me know... >>> >>> WBR, >>> Vadim >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org>> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org<mailto:jperrin at centos.org>> >>> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 3:58 PM >>> To: arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev at centos.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy >>> >>> Overall, it will be easier when we have this alternate kernel plumbed >>> into git and patches/pull requests can be done directly against the >>> repo. I'll pull your patches a bit later today and try them out. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 07/27/2015 06:09 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: >>>> Yes, but not sure if did this in right way. >>>> I've updated config-arm64 with new options and was able to build rpms. >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org>> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org<mailto:jperrin at centos.org>> >>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 10:03 PM >>>> To: arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev at centos.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy >>>> >>>> Sorry, I've been out at OSCON this week with somewhat limited >>>> connectivity. Were you able to get this sorted? >>>> >>>> On 07/22/2015 11:23 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: >>>>> I'm trying to rebuild kernel rpm but it fails due to new options in .config has been added, any help with that would be much appreciated? >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org>> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org<mailto:jperrin at centos.org>> >>>>> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:03 PM >>>>> To: arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:arm-dev at centos.org> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy >>>>> >>>>> I've currently working on a kernel build that's based off the fedora >>>>> tree. The commit hash I'm building from there is >>>>> >>>>> 228ccc4defbda4317b06d561e5fb532c774fe2e2 >>>>> >>>>> My changes are mostly to the spec file, and the removal of the kdbus >>>>> patches. You can find the src.rpm for my kernel at -> >>>>> http://people.centos.org/jperrin/kernels/kernel-4.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1.centos.el7.src.rpm >>>>> >>>>> I have a bit more specfile cleanup to do here, but it will work to patch >>>>> against. >>>>> >>>>> On 07/17/2015 08:53 AM, Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com<mailto:Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> We have some set of patches for our processor (Cavium Thunderx) and would like >>>>>> to add them to CentOS kernel for the time while they are being submitted into >>>>>> mainline. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there any set policy for submitting patches to be included into CentOS >>>>>> kernel? And which kernel version/commit I should base my changes on? >>>>>> >>>>>> Vadim >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Arm-dev mailing list >>>>>> Arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >>>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jim Perrin >>>>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >>>>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Arm-dev mailing list >>>>> Arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Arm-dev mailing list >>>>> Arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jim Perrin >>>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >>>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Arm-dev mailing list >>>> Arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Arm-dev mailing list >>>> Arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jim Perrin >>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Arm-dev mailing list >>> Arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Arm-dev mailing list >>> Arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>> >> >> -- >> Jim Perrin >> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org<mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >> > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77