[Arm-dev] What's the best support hardware model ?

Tue Dec 1 13:21:18 UTC 2015
PixelDrift.NET Sam <devnull at pixeldrift.net>

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan at redsleeve.org> wrote:
> On 2015-12-01 12:43, PixelDrift.NET Sam wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 01/12/15 13:02, PixelDrift.NET Sam wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I built a CentOS 7.1 XU4 image back in October which is also tested
>>>> on XU3.
>>>>
>>>> You can get it from here: https://gitlab.com/pixdrift/cendroid-xu4
>>>>
>>>> It uses the official Cubitruck CentOS 7 image with HardKernel
>>>> compiled 3.10.82 kernel.
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting .. do you have any .spec for that kernel, so that we can
>>> build/test/ship it too ?
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately no, I didn't build from source sorry.
>>
>> I extracted the kernel image from the HardKernel Ubuntu OS image after
>> hitting issues with building the patched XU3/4 kernel from scratch.
>
>
> If you have the source and the .config they used, you should be
> able to re-use the spec from this with minimal modifications:
>
> http://ftp.redsleeve.org/pub/el7/packages/extra/SRPMS/kernel-kirkwood-3.10.92-4.el7.nosrc.rpm
>
> Gordan
>
Thanks for that.

The modified source and config are here:
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux/tree/odroidxu3-3.10.y
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux/blob/odroidxu3-3.10.y/arch/arm/configs/odroidxu3_defconfig

The build process is documented here:
http://odroid.com/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=en:xu3_building_kernel

If I get a minute i'll try building on the XU4 with your .spec. If
anyone else attempts it or has success, please let us know.

> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev