Per my conversation with them, it is a 2U form factor, 48 nodes, with 8GB RAM and 64GB SSD (I imagine hard drives could be swapped for larger local storage if desired). > To: arm-dev at centos.org > From: arrfab at centos.org > Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:24:05 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] What's the best support hardware model ? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/12/15 19:28, miniNodes Info wrote: > > I do see that the conversation has moved on to ARMv8, but quickly > > to add to the 32-bit discussion...The organization that purchased > > the Calxeda assets reached out to me recently, and they have an > > enterprise-grade 32-bit product ready to ship. I can share their > > contact information if its desired (not sure of proper netiquette). > > > > > > -David > > > > Didn't even know that Calxeda had been acquired by another company (I > thought they just went bankrupt) > It would be interesting to consider if that can happen (some kind of > armv7 1 or 2U server with some nodes and local storage) > > > - -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlZeAeUACgkQnVkHo1a+xU7hIQCcCcvCLmSi2/RgrMnnJynoMKyA > d7YAn0/5Ldo6QIamLEYdZ08+kLduiduM > =udXq > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20151201/71d07e43/attachment-0006.html>