[Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches

Wed Dec 9 14:08:40 UTC 2015
Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>

Got it, thanks.

On 12/09/2015 01:01 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Please find the attached APM patches for 4.2 based kernel.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Phong
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Jim Perrin
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:55 AM
> To: arm-dev at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches
> 
> I've just pushed pushed the update to the sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch.
> You can find the new 4.2 based kernel at
> https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!kernel.git
> 
> If you could supply any needed patches for that kernel I'll run through
> the build.
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/02/2015 08:00 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> We need to enable newly added configuration, and the only way I could
>> think of is to do it as part of kernel-aarch64.spec utilizing the
>> existing configuration merge mechanism, and without impacting the
>> config-xxx files received from Redhat.
>>
>> Yes, 4.2 patches are ready. I'll submit as soon as you are ready.
>> However, we still need to resolve the config issue then.
>>
>> -Phong
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote:
>>> I've been reasonably head-down on getting the new sources built.
>>>
>>> I guess my concern here is the need to merge your config changes in
> each
>>> iteration. Is there a particular reason for doing it that way? Are you
>>> trying to ensure ordering here?
>>>
>>> Also, we'll have the updated builds ready to go in the next few days. I
>>> can run with this for the 3.19 update for now, however we'd need the
> 4.2
>>> patches reasonably soon. Would that be a problem?
>>>
>>> On 12/02/2015 03:44 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any feedback?
>>>>
>>>> -Phong
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Phong Vo <pvo at apm.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am resending the config patch. The change is to use merge.pl to
>>>>> merge config-centos-sig into the final config in SPECS/kernel-aarch64
>>>>> instead of modifying Makefile.config.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch is against branch 3.19 of
> git://git.centos.org/sig-altarch/kernel.git
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know what you think.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Phong
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/23/2015 09:42 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The config patch works fine for me.  It would be creating a
>>>>>>> SOURCES/config-centos-sig and also modifying
> SOURCES/Makefile.config.
>>>>>>> Actually, the patch is against the 3.19 version of c7-aarch64, not
> the
>>>>>>> sig-altarch/kernel 3.19 branch version; but I believe both should
> be
>>>>>>> the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right. It's this modification of the Makefile.config I'm trying to
>>>>>> avoid. The way the configs are combined in the spec file mean that
> we
>>>>>> don't need to modify it. It's a semantic difference in how the
> packaging
>>>>>> is done, where I'm trying to reduce or eliminate the need to
>>>>>> modify/touch files provided by rh or in the kernel tarball.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jim Perrin
>>>>>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
>>>>>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Arm-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Arm-dev at centos.org
>>>>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Arm-dev mailing list
>>>> Arm-dev at centos.org
>>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Perrin
>>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
>>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Arm-dev mailing list
>>> Arm-dev at centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Arm-dev mailing list
>> Arm-dev at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> 

-- 
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77