[Arm-dev] Epel Re: Really minimal - Re: CentOS-userland 7 images : call for testers !

Fri Dec 18 13:32:20 UTC 2015
Andreas Reschke <andreas at rirasoft.de>

Am 18.12.2015 14:26, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
> On 12/18/2015 07:01 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 18/12/15 11:56, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> <snip>
>> 
>>> And I know I am going to need epel as well for the mailserver.
>>> Most, if not all that I needed last time were noarch.  A start on a
>>> epel7-arm would be just the noarch rpms.  I will try and dig out my
>>> notes on what I was up against last year doing this.
>>> 
>> So,
>> 
>> Epel for CentOS AltArch will be "interesting" .. there is no epel for
>> i686/aarch64/armhfp, and I don't think that there is a plan for that.
>> Something to consider with some Epel folks though.
>> If it's clear that it will never exist, we can then try to make some
>> resources available within the CentOS Infra (or try to make it happen)
>> to start rebuilding packages from Epel.
> 
> I believe amavisd-new (or at least many of its dependencies) is on
> epel, and at least in epel6 it was noarch.
> 
> And many of the roundcubemail dependencies were on epel.
> 
> So if you want a mailserver, you need stuff from epel.  Last year
> after some frustration and venting, I was pulling the noarch rpms from
> the epel6-i386 repo mirror and doing a localinstall.  It would be nice
> to start building at least the noarch from epel sooner rather than
> later.
> 
> Of course, I will not be replacing my current mailserver until
> Centos7-arm goes live.  But hopefully that is not too far off!
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev

That would be fine. I'm also in the process to build a mailserver with 
the cubietruck after christmas.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Andreas Reschke