Am 18.12.2015 14:26, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: > On 12/18/2015 07:01 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 18/12/15 11:56, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> <snip> >> >>> And I know I am going to need epel as well for the mailserver. >>> Most, if not all that I needed last time were noarch. A start on a >>> epel7-arm would be just the noarch rpms. I will try and dig out my >>> notes on what I was up against last year doing this. >>> >> So, >> >> Epel for CentOS AltArch will be "interesting" .. there is no epel for >> i686/aarch64/armhfp, and I don't think that there is a plan for that. >> Something to consider with some Epel folks though. >> If it's clear that it will never exist, we can then try to make some >> resources available within the CentOS Infra (or try to make it happen) >> to start rebuilding packages from Epel. > > I believe amavisd-new (or at least many of its dependencies) is on > epel, and at least in epel6 it was noarch. > > And many of the roundcubemail dependencies were on epel. > > So if you want a mailserver, you need stuff from epel. Last year > after some frustration and venting, I was pulling the noarch rpms from > the epel6-i386 repo mirror and doing a localinstall. It would be nice > to start building at least the noarch from epel sooner rather than > later. > > Of course, I will not be replacing my current mailserver until > Centos7-arm goes live. But hopefully that is not too far off! > > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev That would be fine. I'm also in the process to build a mailserver with the cubietruck after christmas. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Reschke