Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 12/31/2015 06:05 AM, Carl T. Miller wrote: >> Fabian Arrotin wrote: >>> Can you confirm that it's indeed the rpi1 model ? If so you know now >>> why it doesn't work. >> Yes, it is an rpi1. Are there plans to ever port CentOS Userland >> to to armv6hl? Also, would you consider updating the wiki page >> to make it more clear about which models are supported? That >> would save some frustration for people like me who find the page >> when searching for "centos on rpi". > > The Redsleeve project has armv5 support. Pretty decent group of people. > > But the approach taken here precludes the armv5 (and v6) architecture. > Lots of reasons why, it seems, but this issue was beaten up a lot over > on the Fedora-arm list years ago and Centos7-arm inherits the Fedora-arm > work, just like Centos7-x86_64 does the Fedora-x86_64... Yes, this makes sense now that I know a bit of the history. For now I'll go back to Redsleeve until if/when I get an rpi2. Thanks for the info. c