Hi Jim, Were you able to apply patches and test them? Are there any issues ? if so please let me know... WBR, Vadim ________________________________________ From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 3:58 PM To: arm-dev at centos.org Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy Overall, it will be easier when we have this alternate kernel plumbed into git and patches/pull requests can be done directly against the repo. I'll pull your patches a bit later today and try them out. On 07/27/2015 06:09 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: > Yes, but not sure if did this in right way. > I've updated config-arm64 with new options and was able to build rpms. > > ________________________________________ > From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 10:03 PM > To: arm-dev at centos.org > Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy > > Sorry, I've been out at OSCON this week with somewhat limited > connectivity. Were you able to get this sorted? > > On 07/22/2015 11:23 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: >> I'm trying to rebuild kernel rpm but it fails due to new options in .config has been added, any help with that would be much appreciated? >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> >> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:03 PM >> To: arm-dev at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy >> >> I've currently working on a kernel build that's based off the fedora >> tree. The commit hash I'm building from there is >> >> 228ccc4defbda4317b06d561e5fb532c774fe2e2 >> >> My changes are mostly to the spec file, and the removal of the kdbus >> patches. You can find the src.rpm for my kernel at -> >> http://people.centos.org/jperrin/kernels/kernel-4.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1.centos.el7.src.rpm >> >> I have a bit more specfile cleanup to do here, but it will work to patch >> against. >> >> On 07/17/2015 08:53 AM, Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We have some set of patches for our processor (Cavium Thunderx) and would like >>> to add them to CentOS kernel for the time while they are being submitted into >>> mainline. >>> >>> Is there any set policy for submitting patches to be included into CentOS >>> kernel? And which kernel version/commit I should base my changes on? >>> >>> Vadim >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Arm-dev mailing list >>> Arm-dev at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>> >> >> -- >> Jim Perrin >> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >> > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev