[Arm-dev] enough packages for a @core install ?

Tue Jun 2 01:23:33 UTC 2015
cc35359 at gmail.com <cc35359 at gmail.com>

I just read about the Google summer of code project in regards to repacking/customizing arm 32 images, how does that effect what we are looking to accomplish?
I don't mind assisting in the rootfs build (the right way), but I've never tried it in my 20 years of nix :-). I'm wondering if I use my pi image, chroot into a new pqrtition and do the installs in that? That sounds easy, but not sure if it is that easy.




On June 1, 2015 11:24:09 AM CDT, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hi,
>
>It seems we have now reach the point where enough packages are built
>to start looking at producing a working minimal setup. (with the
>c7-buildroot and c7-pass-1 repos)
>Who does take that in charge, and document it ?
>
>Cheers,
>
>- -- 
>
>Fabian Arrotin
>The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
>gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iEYEARECAAYFAlVshykACgkQnVkHo1a+xU5YtACfYOFWMIuJgBnrKSAOx2mjKCo/
>/z4AnjRshY3xIHGQIhJcruiXsbs+1Dcj
>=TBOb
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>_______________________________________________
>Arm-dev mailing list
>Arm-dev at centos.org
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20150601/31b83dd0/attachment-0006.html>