Volunteers willing to maintain auxiliary repositories are always welcome. On 2015-05-06 15:50, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Those of us running Redsleeve 6, have had to deal with no up to date > EPEL6-arm. Fortunately, most that I needed were noarch, so I was able > to just get the rpms and do a localinstall. > > So we really do need an EPEL5-arm and someone maintaining it... > > On 05/06/2015 10:16 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > >> I'm not sure if this question belongs here or on a fedora mailing >> list. Or maybe it's already been discussed somewhere and I just >> missed it. >> >> Is there a plan on what to do with EPEL7 packages, for arm? >> Is Fedora thinking of adding arm to the EPEL7 build arch? >> Is CentOS planning on hosting a repo that contains those? >> If so, will it be all EPEL7 or just a subset? >> >> Right now, if you had all the CentOS7 arm packages compiled and >> ready to go, you wouldn't be able to create a build/plague machine, >> because mock, and several of it's dependencies, are in EPEL7, and >> not RHEL7. >> >> Anyway, if this has already been discussed, could someone point me >> at it. If it hasn't, where would be the appropriate place to >> discuss it? >> >> Thanks >> >> Troy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev [1] > > > > Links: > ------ > [1] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev