According to Hans, there items in at least 3.19 that match uboot 2015.02 to support more features on armv7 SOCs. The more board/features work, the better the take-up. So I vote to follow aarch64. On 05/11/2015 10:23 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > As Jim used kernel 4.0.0-1 for the aarch64 (alpha) build (announced > today), I was wondering what would be the best kernel to use/target > for armv7hl. > Is patching the el7 kernel the way to go, or do we prefer/want to use > the same one everywhere if possible (so also using 4.0.0-1, and > tracking the aarch64 version). > > Cheers, > > - -- > > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlVQ5ZgACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6BFgCfbIaaP1kpWUKHTIKuW55cUiaS > 4NYAn3cjUVikbTqYvXllMb4l4B9PMSZO > =xI8e > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev