On 26/04/16 16:39, Fahad wrote: > Thanks Fabian, > > But my question was mainly about when should I expect a reliable > arm/arm64 repos that I can trust to use as a production server and > expect security updates to come in a timely manner as the normal > CentOS x86/x86_64? > Is ARM support something CentOS is targeting or just as a side project > when time is available? > > BTW, the URL http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/epel-pass-1/ is down > at the moment of writing this email. > So, arm/arm64 (armhfp/aarch64) are released and maintained. While on the armhfp side we weren't able to build everything, at least everthing that was built/released/signed/pushed to mirror.centos.org is maintained (see for example the updates for armhfp/CentOS 7.21511 : http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/updates/armhfp/Packages/?C=M;O=D) WRT to armv7.dev.centos.org, it was announced that we had to reorganize several physical nodes in a rack, and yes, that node was impacted (see https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2016-April/021836.html) but is now back online. One goal behind that maintenance window is that we'll implement (in the following days) some mechanism to automatically submit build jobs for updates pkgs at the same time as for the other arches (while x86_64 is obviously the authoritative one). Actually aarch64 was added in the last weeks and we'll now add armhfp to the same process (as it was done "semi" automated until now) I hope that this answers your questions :-) -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20160427/d32556a2/attachment-0006.sig>