Please. Ordinarily I'd say no, but I'm traveling for meetings this week and don't want to lose it. I'd ask that you submit the bug or ping me Monday about it and I'll get to work. On Aug 1, 2016 00:16, "Ed Brand" <ebrand0007 at gmail.com> wrote: > SUCCESS!!! > > What a PITA. I did hit the glibc artifact issue, ended up building a > complete cross-compiled gcc-4.9 toolchain for Centos7 x86_64. gcc-4.8 is > just not happy being cross-compiled. > > I did a write up and uploaded everything to the below link if you want to > give it a go, or repeat for arm32 port. Basically followed the f21 stage 1 > port docs to get it bootstrapped. I would like to see this in the main > distro. Do you need a bug filed? > > > http://arm.brandint.com/centos7/aarch64/bootstrap/Centos7-AARCH64-CrossCompiler.html > > > Cheers > > -Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 07/28/2016 08:38 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> >> On 07/28/2016 04:17 PM, Ed Brand wrote: >> >>> Libatomic and libgnat from gcc-4.8.5-4 appear not to be built on >>> aarch64. How to file bug? See below from spec: >>> >>> Bugs can be filed at bugs.centos.org >> >> Summary: Various compilers (C, C++, Objective-C, Java, ...) >>> Name: gcc >>> %if 0%{?rhel} == 7 >>> %global gcc_version 4.8.2 >>> %else >>> %global gcc_version 4.8.5 >>> %endif >>> Version: 4.8.5 >>> Release: %{gcc_release}%{?dist} >>> ... >>> ( Missing aarch64 ) >>> v >>> %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 ppc ppc64 ppc64le ppc64p7 s390 s390x aarch64 >>> %{arm} >>> %global build_libatomic 1 >>> >>> >>> I did a smoke test and was able to bootstrap both using f21 aarch64. >>> Have the rpms if needed. >>> >> >> Some of the gcc bits I had patched out of the initial gcc build, because >> of the lack of early support and/or bootstrap pain (primarily ada and >> related bits). >> >> Unfortunately building against f21 can potentially cause issues with >> gcc/glibc artifacts because of the newer glibc/gcc included in fedora. >> >> When we did the initial port/build for this, we had to start from f19 >> aarch64 builds and work up from there because of this. If you can >> (re)build against the el7 aarch64 build, that will give you a better >> result. I'll poke it tomorrow. >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20160802/12d65a16/attachment-0005.html>