-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13/01/16 12:35, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 13/01/16 06:15, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> On 01/13/2016 06:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/06/2016 08:54 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> On 06/01/16 14:46, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>>> I see that there are no updates available since the build. >>>>> >>>>> I hope that soon we will be getting updates. It is one >>>>> thing to put up a simple web server. For my DNS server, I >>>>> want to know I am getting somewhat regular bind updates. >>>>> >>>>> Also as I previously mentioned I have found programs that >>>>> are not in the base like spamassasin. >>>>> >>>>> The bigger project is getting activity on epel for arm so >>>>> we can do a decent mail server. >>>>> >>>>> thanks! >>>> Are we missing updates ? Afaik we're up2date with updates. >>>> The only newer packages that appeared for x86_64 si are >>>> kernel/grub2, which we don't use. >>>> >>>> For specific packages missing from >>>> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7.2.1511/os/armhfp/ , >>>> reaons can be that : - - package failed to build - - package >>>> built succesfully, but depends itself on failed package[s] >>>> >>>> Dont forget that , for repoclosure, all built package but >>>> having deps on missing packages, weren't included in the os >>>> repository pushed to mirror.centos.org >>>> >>>> For Spamassassin, I see that it built for C.7.1503 : >>>> http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c7-pass-1/spamassassin/3.4.0-1.el7/armv7hl/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So now you can chase after the missing Requires: pkgs, see >>>> what's the build issue, and propose a fix/patch ;-) >>> >>> # yum install spamassassin Loaded plugins: fastestmirror base | >>> 3.6 kB 00:00 epel | 2.9 kB 00:00 extras | 2.9 kB 00:00 updates >>> | 2.9 kB 00:00 (1/2): extras/7/armhfp/primary_db | 11 kB 00:06 >>> (2/2): updates/7/armhfp/primary_db | 133 kB 00:07 Determining >>> fastest mirrors No package spamassassin available. Error: >>> Nothing to do >>> >>> It is not in the repo, either base or updates. > >> what Fabian meant was that for packages which are not in the 7.2 >> repos yet, you should start looking for them in the buildlogs >> of the older release(s) -- 7.1.1503 in the particular case of >> SA. Download the package from the URL pointed to by Fabian, add >> it to your local repo, retry installing. wash, rinse, repeat for >> any deps that arise. > > > Yeah, that's what I meant :-) otoh, I just had a quick look at that > one, and it can be installed automatically with the base repo, so > something not caught by my compose_tree script it seems. Let me try > to add it in the os repo, after it will be signed, and repodata > regenerated. > > Cheers, > Just to add that we decided to not touch the os repo once released. So, even if that's technically not an update, we'll release it through the updates repo Cheers, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlaWUH4ACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6QZQCeMBuKhuHBLS11LNJMO7weE82e cf0AnizjXLyFOJbv90XWPm7HFQBHt6zu =WVNS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----