The build appears to be successful, so I'm going to smoke-test it tonight, and push tomorrow. If all goes well it will hit updates and git tomorrow morning (US/Central time). On 01/05/2016 08:12 PM, Phong Vo wrote: > Thanks, Jim! > > I am attaching an additional patch to fix an issue due to a previous > change causing > Mellanox driver not to come up. Please see if you can accommodate it in > this round > of kernel update. > > -Phong > > -----Original Message----- > From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Jim Perrin > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:05 PM > To: arm-dev at centos.org > Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches > > I hit a snag with the installer segfaulting on specific hardware. I've > since resolved that and have pushed an iso for Johnny to test as well. > If that works, I'll be syncing the trees and pushing this week. > > Your patches will be rolled into an update kernel that will also be > available at the same time. This way the install media matches what > people expect, and the updates are available to enable the additional > features. > > On 01/04/2016 07:57 PM, Phong Vo wrote: >> Happy New Year, Jim. >> >> I am following up on this submission whether it has been done. >> >> Also, when do we have a full 4.2 release with installer and rootfs? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Phong >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Jim Perrin >> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 9:09 PM >> To: arm-dev at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches >> >> Got it, thanks. >> >> On 12/09/2015 01:01 AM, Phong Vo wrote: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Please find the attached APM patches for 4.2 based kernel. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -Phong >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org] On >>> Behalf Of Jim Perrin >>> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:55 AM >>> To: arm-dev at centos.org >>> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches >>> >>> I've just pushed pushed the update to the sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch. >>> You can find the new 4.2 based kernel at >>> https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!kernel.git >>> >>> If you could supply any needed patches for that kernel I'll run through >>> the build. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/02/2015 08:00 AM, Phong Vo wrote: >>>> Hi Jim, >>>> >>>> We need to enable newly added configuration, and the only way I could >>>> think of is to do it as part of kernel-aarch64.spec utilizing the >>>> existing configuration merge mechanism, and without impacting the >>>> config-xxx files received from Redhat. >>>> >>>> Yes, 4.2 patches are ready. I'll submit as soon as you are ready. >>>> However, we still need to resolve the config issue then. >>>> >>>> -Phong >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: >>>>> I've been reasonably head-down on getting the new sources built. >>>>> >>>>> I guess my concern here is the need to merge your config changes in >>> each >>>>> iteration. Is there a particular reason for doing it that way? Are > you >>>>> trying to ensure ordering here? >>>>> >>>>> Also, we'll have the updated builds ready to go in the next few days. >> I >>>>> can run with this for the 3.19 update for now, however we'd need the >>> 4.2 >>>>> patches reasonably soon. Would that be a problem? >>>>> >>>>> On 12/02/2015 03:44 AM, Phong Vo wrote: >>>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have any feedback? >>>>>> >>>>>> -Phong >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Phong Vo <pvo at apm.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am resending the config patch. The change is to use merge.pl to >>>>>>> merge config-centos-sig into the final config in >> SPECS/kernel-aarch64 >>>>>>> instead of modifying Makefile.config. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The patch is against branch 3.19 of >>> git://git.centos.org/sig-altarch/kernel.git >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let me know what you think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Phong >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 11/23/2015 09:42 AM, Phong Vo wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The config patch works fine for me. It would be creating a >>>>>>>>> SOURCES/config-centos-sig and also modifying >>> SOURCES/Makefile.config. >>>>>>>>> Actually, the patch is against the 3.19 version of c7-aarch64, > not >>> the >>>>>>>>> sig-altarch/kernel 3.19 branch version; but I believe both should >>> be >>>>>>>>> the same. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Right. It's this modification of the Makefile.config I'm trying to >>>>>>>> avoid. The way the configs are combined in the spec file mean that >>> we >>>>>>>> don't need to modify it. It's a semantic difference in how the >>> packaging >>>>>>>> is done, where I'm trying to reduce or eliminate the need to >>>>>>>> modify/touch files provided by rh or in the kernel tarball. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Jim Perrin >>>>>>>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >>>>>>>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Arm-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> Arm-dev at centos.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Arm-dev mailing list >>>>>> Arm-dev at centos.org >>>>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jim Perrin >>>>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >>>>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Arm-dev mailing list >>>>> Arm-dev at centos.org >>>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Arm-dev mailing list >>>> Arm-dev at centos.org >>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Arm-dev mailing list >>> Arm-dev at centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >>> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77