[Arm-dev] next steps for altarch with ceph and openstack
George Dunlap
george.dunlap at citrix.comTue Jul 5 16:38:03 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [Arm-dev] [rdo-list] next steps for altarch with ceph and openstack
- Next message: [Arm-dev] next steps for altarch with ceph and openstack
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/07/16 16:49, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 05.07.2016 o 16:28, Jim Perrin pisze: >> With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well >> as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing >> these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and >> the ownership for those steps. >> >> Thomas please correct/update these as needed > > Added few people to Cc: from pre-RH summit threads. > >> 1. new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka. >> Will ceph need this as well? > >> 2. If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch, >> dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev, >> centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need >> to be addressed. > > It would be good to populate all those repositories. I opened bugs for > all tags: > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11084 (openstack) > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11085 (ceph) > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11086 (virt/kvm-common) I looked at this bug, but I couldn't tell exactly what packages you wanted in here, and why the existing KVM packages weren't sufficient. Could you just sketch out a brief summary? Thanks, -George
- Previous message: [Arm-dev] [rdo-list] next steps for altarch with ceph and openstack
- Next message: [Arm-dev] next steps for altarch with ceph and openstack
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Arm-dev mailing list