2016-07-07 17:41 GMT+02:00 Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>: > > > On 07/07/2016 03:26 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> W dniu 05.07.2016 o 18:38, George Dunlap pisze: >>> On 05/07/16 16:49, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >>>> W dniu 05.07.2016 o 16:28, Jim Perrin pisze: >>>>> With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well >>>>> as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing >>>>> these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and >>>>> the ownership for those steps. >>>>> >>>>> Thomas please correct/update these as needed >>>> >>>> Added few people to Cc: from pre-RH summit threads. >>>> >>>>> 1. new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka. >>>>> Will ceph need this as well? >>>> >>>>> 2. If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch, >>>>> dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev, >>>>> centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need >>>>> to be addressed. >>>> >>>> It would be good to populate all those repositories. I opened bugs for >>>> all tags: >>>> >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11084 (openstack) >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11085 (ceph) >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11086 (virt/kvm-common) >>> >>> I looked at this bug, but I couldn't tell exactly what packages you >>> wanted in here, and why the existing KVM packages weren't sufficient. >>> Could you just sketch out a brief summary? >> >> You are right. I am sometimes still lost in CentOS repository structure. >> >> What is in x86-64 virt/kvm-common repository is present in os/ one for >> aarch64 already. Only qemu-kvm-ev update (2.7.1 -> 2.10.1) would be nice >> to have. > > We can pull this in. > >> So we can kill that dependency from centos-release-openstack-mitaka >> package. Added note to the bug (I lack permissions to close it as notabug). > > > I might suggest that for now (until we get the mirror bits sorted), we > create a centos-release-mitaka-altarch package. This would avoid needing > to mess with the existing x86_64 bits. once everything is aligned, then > we can obsolete/provides the replacement and use the standard package > across all architectures. > Works for me. > > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > > _______________________________________________ > rdo-list mailing list > rdo-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com