On 19/03/16 12:51, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 03/19/2016 04:12 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote: >> Bump. It seems the kernel binary rpm doesn't match the availability of >> the sources for it. I can find no src.rpm matching the binary, and the >> CentOS git doesn't seem to include this version: >> https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!kernel-aarch64 >> > > You're looking in the wrong place. That's the git tree for the redhat > provided rhel(sa) sources. We don't modify that tree. > > You want the sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch from > https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!kernel.git Ah... My bad. In that repository, README.md says to look for the c7 branch - and there appears to be no c7 branch. Is the "sig-altarch7-aarch64" branch the correct one to use going forward? >> Can you please provide the full src.rpm used to build the >> kernel-4.2.0-0.26.el7.1.aarch64 package? > > http://people.centos.org/jperrin/srpms/kernel-aarch64-4.2.0-0.26.el7.1.src.rpm Thanks, most appreciated. > I might also recommend a new thread rather than just a subject change > for discussions like this. This message was very nearly lost to me as > I've stopped watching the gigabyte board thread. Apologies, fixed now. Gordan