On 05/23/2016 03:56 PM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: > >> Great. I'll see about pulling these into the source rpms for a small >> bump until it's resolved in a later rhel source package. Were you seeing >> your crashes right away, or can this be resolved via a 'yum update' on >> an impacted system? > > About week ago I did fresh system install with custom kernel and were able to see issue. > Then did "yum update" but the were no updates for mozjs17 package as far as I can remember. So issue was fixed by updating and rebuilding mozjs with patch. > Let me check it once again to be sure that I didn't miss something (will run whole install and yum update) and I'll get back to you tomorrow. It'll be tomorrow or so before I'm able to roll the patch out. Until then there won't be any change. My question was more, does the server die immediately on install (thus needing the patch for installation) or does it boot enough to get updates. If it can get updates, then that's a much easier fix. > ________________________________________ > From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 11:22:41 PM > To: arm-dev at centos.org > Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] [question] CentOS 7 Installer ISO generating > > On 05/23/2016 03:02 PM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: >> Hi Jim, >> >> Thanks for reply. >> >>> What patch did you apply? For this sort of thing, I could be convinced >>> to bump the mozjs release with said patch included. >> - for mozjs17 package I've applied this one https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8740353 >> - probably you may want to apply patch for mozjs24 package also (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8740354); >> > > Great. I'll see about pulling these into the source rpms for a small > bump until it's resolved in a later rhel source package. Were you seeing > your crashes right away, or can this be resolved via a 'yum update' on > an impacted system? > >>> Which packages? KVM support is already built into the distro, so are >>> these additional, or patched versions? >> There are a lots of testing to be done first with original packages, but probably we may want to provide patched qemu. >> >> Vadim > > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77