I just pushed this update. If you give it a couple hours to sync out, a 'yum update' should resolve the crashes you're seeing. On 05/23/2016 04:09 PM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: > >> My question was more, does the server >> die immediately on install (thus needing the patch for installation) or >> does it boot enough to get updates. > It installs fine and boots into shell successfully. So the system is usable and it is able to install updates. > ________________________________________ > From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 12:03:29 AM > To: arm-dev at centos.org > Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] [question] CentOS 7 Installer ISO generating > > On 05/23/2016 03:56 PM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: >> >>> Great. I'll see about pulling these into the source rpms for a small >>> bump until it's resolved in a later rhel source package. Were you seeing >>> your crashes right away, or can this be resolved via a 'yum update' on >>> an impacted system? >> >> About week ago I did fresh system install with custom kernel and were able to see issue. >> Then did "yum update" but the were no updates for mozjs17 package as far as I can remember. So issue was fixed by updating and rebuilding mozjs with patch. >> Let me check it once again to be sure that I didn't miss something (will run whole install and yum update) and I'll get back to you tomorrow. > > It'll be tomorrow or so before I'm able to roll the patch out. Until > then there won't be any change. My question was more, does the server > die immediately on install (thus needing the patch for installation) or > does it boot enough to get updates. If it can get updates, then that's a > much easier fix. > >> ________________________________________ >> From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org <arm-dev-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> >> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 11:22:41 PM >> To: arm-dev at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] [question] CentOS 7 Installer ISO generating >> >> On 05/23/2016 03:02 PM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Thanks for reply. >>> >>>> What patch did you apply? For this sort of thing, I could be convinced >>>> to bump the mozjs release with said patch included. >>> - for mozjs17 package I've applied this one https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8740353 >>> - probably you may want to apply patch for mozjs24 package also (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8740354); >>> >> >> Great. I'll see about pulling these into the source rpms for a small >> bump until it's resolved in a later rhel source package. Were you seeing >> your crashes right away, or can this be resolved via a 'yum update' on >> an impacted system? >> >>>> Which packages? KVM support is already built into the distro, so are >>>> these additional, or patched versions? >>> There are a lots of testing to be done first with original packages, but probably we may want to provide patched qemu. >>> >>> Vadim >> >> >> -- >> Jim Perrin >> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >> > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77