[Arm-dev] 7.3.1611 armhfp build status, and testing feedback

Thu Nov 17 14:51:30 UTC 2016
Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org>

On 12/11/16 16:39, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
> Hi Fabian,
> 
> I don't have the time to go through the whole list, but I think I have
> some pointers:
> 
> general: I saw quite a couple of packages that only build against 7.3
> rpms, but also a fair number needed specific packages from 7.2. mostly
> glib2, xorg-x11-server-source, tzdata IIRC
> 
> - ruby
>     I see the same thing on armv5 AND x86_64. unsure what the issue is.

I had a look at the x86_64 mock config file and it seems that we need
specific version of glibc and openssl to be able to build : testing that
on my side now (ref:
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.1611.01/ruby/20161115141643/2.0.0.648-29.el7.x86_64/mock.cfg)

> I hope the regular CentOS build sees the same and finds a fix
> - java 1.6 and 1.7
>     ARM32JIT is broken, see
> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2942

Yes, 1.8 builds fine though (and we never shipped 1.6 nor 1.7 so
expected to fail too)

> - libcmis
>     build without tests.

Interesting, wondering if there is a way to fix the test and see if the
fail is a real failing test or something else

> - python-cryptography
>     misses dependencies that are not in the tree. Do you know where the
> git repo is for the extras tree?

Yes, in extras and those were built/pushed to buildlogs too :
-
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-extras/python-cryptography-vectors/20161115131701/python-cryptography-vectors-1.3.1-2.el7.x86_64/python-cryptography-vectors-1.3.1-2.el7.src.rpm
-
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-extras/python-hypothesis/20161115132101/python-hypothesis-3.1.3-1.el7.x86_64/python-hypothesis-3.1.3-1.el7.src.rpm

> - mesa
>     add /usr/lib/dri/msm_dri.so to the %files

Yes, and I fixed too :
http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c71611-pass-1/mesa/11.2.2-2.20160614.el7.centos/

> - mvapic2, dapl, mpitests, mstflint and perftest
>     those I never got to work on armv5

Same on armhfp and I don't know if people are using those either

> - glibc
>     as discussed earlier

Yes, and I applied your patch , and that's how from that point I rebuilt
all the other ones against that glibc built pkg :
http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c71611-pass-1/glibc/2.17-157.el7.centos/

Cheers,

-- 
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20161117/1efff2d4/attachment-0006.sig>