Yes, that convention should still be followed. Jeremy, are you able to resubmit this patch with the modification to config-centos-sig please? Phong, apart from that correction, are you okay with this change? On 11/18/2016 03:20 AM, Phong Vo wrote: > +-----Original Message----- > +From: arm-dev-bounces at centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces at centos.org] On > +Behalf Of Jeremy Linton > +Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 6:00 AM > +To: arm-dev at centos.org > +Subject: [Arm-dev] [PATCH] redhat: configs: Enable 48 bit VA > + > +The current RHELSA kernel is using a 42bit VA which is too limiting for > +possible near future workloads. > +Update this to 48 bits. This patch has a dependency on mozjs versions in > +the distro being patched to work with virtual address spaces >47 bits. > + > +Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton at arm.com> > +--- > + SOURCES/config-arm64 | 2 ++ > + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > + > +diff --git a/SOURCES/config-arm64 b/SOURCES/config-arm64 index > +9f0895a..f30229d 100644 > +--- a/SOURCES/config-arm64 > ++++ b/SOURCES/config-arm64 > +@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ > + CONFIG_64BIT=y > + CONFIG_ARM64=y > ++CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS_48=y > ++CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS=48 > + CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=y > + > + > +-- > +2.5.5 > > The convention for CentOS 7.2 is that any overriding of the default > config's inherited from > Redhat would go into config-centos-sig. Do we still follow that for > CentOS 7.3? > > -Phong > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77