At 02:54 PM 10/21/2016, you wrote: >On 10/21/16 23:36, david wrote: > > At 02:26 PM 10/21/2016, you wrote: > >> content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > >> content-length: 376 > >> > >> > >> On Friday, 21 October, 2016 21:24 CEST, Ian Pilcher > >> <arequipeno at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Can we expect an armv7hl kernel update to address CVE-2016-5195? > >> > > >> For redsleeve (rebuild redhat/centos for armv5) I just made updated > >> kernels for the raspberrypi. > >> the source rpm should be similar for me and for armv7. > >> > >> I attached my spec file to this mail. > >> > >> Jacco > >> > > > > Does this mean that > > raspi2-redsleeve7.2-cli-0.5.img > > is no longer the "best" image file? > > > > If so, a pointer to its replacement would be greatly appreciated, > > since tomoorw I'm going to install on Rpi3. > >Well, I was not planning on updating the image each and every time there >is a new package out for something that is in the image. So yes, that is >still the latest image. The only thing you need to do is a 'yum update' >after install. > >Jacco That's a good policy. The image should only be updated if "yum update" is insufficient. And thanks for the prompt response. David Kurn