On 15/06/17 14:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Anything to note about the new kernelll? > Nothing special (and not Critical CVE either that I could see in that LTS branch), but as Johnny built a newer one for AltArch/i686 I decided to also rebase to latest from kernel LTS branch > Trivial question, why is it 4.9.30-203 and not 4.9.30-204, replacing > 4.9.13-203? The important bit is 4.9.30 vs 4.9.13 (the rest is for rpm versioning) > > Also how do people claim to have the linux box up for 6 mo or more when > kernel updates come out more frequently than that? Not that I mind > having to install a new kernel... It's up to each admin to decide if they want to reboot on newer kernel or not :-) -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20170615/17c4d0c6/attachment-0006.sig>