On 16/06/17 22:02, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 06/15/2017 10:06 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> On 15/06/17 14:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> Anything to note about the new kernelll? >>> >> Nothing special (and not Critical CVE either that I could see in that >> LTS branch), but as Johnny built a newer one for AltArch/i686 I decided >> to also rebase to latest from kernel LTS branch >> >>> Trivial question, why is it 4.9.30-203 and not 4.9.30-204, replacing >>> 4.9.13-203? >> The important bit is 4.9.30 vs 4.9.13 (the rest is for rpm versioning) >> >>> Also how do people claim to have the linux box up for 6 mo or more when >>> kernel updates come out more frequently than that? Not that I mind >>> having to install a new kernel... >> It's up to each admin to decide if they want to reboot on newer kernel >> or not :-) > > Why does /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf not get updated when a new kernel > is installed? > > I probably should learn on how to create a menu, as all I do is a simple > sed command to replace the old kernel with the new since there is no > menuing control? in a kernel update. > Reason why the update-boot tool exists and is mentioned for quite some time on the dedicated wiki page (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/Arm32?highlight=%28arm32%29#head-abe59e79c4794862a53246e90f3148f1e607f142) -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20170616/b9fcfeda/attachment-0006.sig>