[Arm-dev] Any type of light Desktop Environment on Arm Centos7+RPi3
Robert Moskowitz
rgm at htt-consult.com
Mon Mar 6 15:44:35 UTC 2017
I suspect the login screen is very light. There is that little icon
that lets you select which GDM gets loaded, so the 'load' comes in
loading a given GDM. I had problems with F24-X86_64 loading Cinnamon
even when you selected Xfce. As it is I have both installed, but the
login defaults now to loading Xfce. Supposedly the bug has been fixed.
Quite some years back on Fedora-arm, probably F22, there was a GDM
discussion and Xfce and LDXE were the 'winners' in memory and cpu. I
tried LDXE, but liked the feel of Xfce and switched to it. With Fedora
images, it is really easy to try a GDM, just build a mSD card for each
GDM and boot and see how it goes.
Still use k3b...
On 03/06/2017 10:16 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> Last time I checked, KDE memory footprint was quite similar to XFCE
> (and in any case much smaller than, say, Firefox).
> I don't use Gnome so cannot comment on that, but I don't imagine GDM
> itself is that heavy just to display the login screen.
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com
> <mailto:rgm at htt-consult.com>> wrote:
>
> It is all about resources consumed by the GDM. Gnome is a real
> hog. Also 2D vs 3D. I would think that for a server, 2D is enough.
>
> Battery life may not be an issue for C7 users like it is for my
> F24 notebook; I gained considerable battery life switching to XFce
> from Gnome.
>
> IMNSHO, it is a priorities thing. If all rpms compile equally as
> well, the ones that use the least memory and cpu over others.
>
> My 1cent worth.
>
> On 03/06/2017 09:24 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> KDE works fine for me on RedSleeve, so it definitely should be
>> possible to get it working on CentOS as well.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Robert Moskowitz
>> <rgm at htt-consult.com <mailto:rgm at htt-consult.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/06/2017 08:41 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>>
>> On 04/03/17 11:20, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>>
>> On 03/03/17 16:49, Hamid Safe wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>> I was wondering if there is a method to provide a
>> "basic" graphical env
>> on Centos7 arm. This is in line with the recent
>> upstream Fedora
>> publishing all types with their ver:25. also the
>> fact that Raspbian now
>> released a stable graphical env that works out of
>> the box with all the
>> goodies.
>> My tries no matter what type of graphical env
>> chosen have failed with
>> dependencies not met. I have already set up the
>> epel for arm. I know
>> that you have gone a long way preparing the
>> Centos7 minimal for the arm
>> and it is already awesome, however having a
>> graphical skin particularly
>> in arm boards sometimes is a must-have requirement.
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't think someone/anyone really spent time
>> investigating the whole
>> chain for a desktop environment on CentOS 7 armhfp.
>> I've myself never
>> tried even to just see if that would work. The
>> initial goal was to have
>> "minimal" working, as most users are probably
>> targeting such system. If
>> now some people would like to spend time
>> investigating what would be
>> needed, what's still to be built, etc, that can
>> "become a thing" :-)
>>
>>
>> Just had 5 minutes to connect a rpi2 to my tft screen and
>> tested the
>> following :
>>
>> yum group install 'Server with GUI' --skip-broken
>> yum install xorg-x11-drv-fbdev.armv7hl
>> xorg-x11-drv-evdev.armv7hl xterm
>>
>> After that , as I was able to get a X environment working
>> with
>> xinit /bin/xterm
>>
>> So I guess it's now a matter of finding a correct
>> GDM/login manager and
>> then something light that can be used ...
>>
>>
>> I vote for Xfce. Though LXDE seems to have a following. You
>> can try them all from the latest rawhide builds over at:
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=appliance&order=-id
>> <https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=appliance&order=-id>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Arm-dev mailing list
>> Arm-dev at centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org>
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>> <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Arm-dev mailing list
>> Arm-dev at centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org>
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>> <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev>
> _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing
> list Arm-dev at centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org>
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20170306/420d5d87/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Arm-dev
mailing list