[Arm-dev] More questions on BPi - Re: Kernel for BananaPi R1 (Lamobo R1) - Success
mo.ucina
mo.ucina at gmail.com
Wed May 10 12:06:52 UTC 2017
Update , the RGMII patch has finally made it in , but it is in kernel
4.11 . What are the chances it will be backported to 4.9 ? Or is there a
plan to uplift Centos arm kernel to 4.11 ?
Regards
Milorad
On 10/05/17 21:50, mo.ucina wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> I have been using the patches for the switch driver on kernel 4.4 for
> a while now , and compiling them into the kernel . The sources are
> from OpenWrt and require a userspace program to configure the switch
> called swconfig as I mentioned below . It also needs to be compiled
> from OpenWrt sources and patched to remove some unnecessary bits that
> OWRT puts in . Things such as Lucy support anywho , it works ok . I am
> using the Lamobo R1 to route so I have defined two interfaces with
> vlans , then I use the swconfig to assign those vlans to switch ports
> . This is done on boot (since config is lost after reboot , it is not
> persistent ) by NetworkManager Dispatcher via a script . The path for
> that is /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/pre-up.d/ . In there the
> configuration is is set up such as this :
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> # VLAN config for BCM53125
>
> ifconfig eth0 up
>
> /usr/local/bin/swconfig dev eth0 set reset
> /usr/local/bin/swconfig dev eth0 set reset_mib 1
> /usr/local/bin/swconfig dev eth0 set enable_vlan 1
> /usr/local/bin/swconfig dev eth0 vlan 101 set ports '3 8t'
> /usr/local/bin/swconfig dev eth0 vlan 102 set ports '4 8t'
> /usr/local/bin/swconfig dev eth0 set apply
>
>
> Since kernel 4.9 the upstream have added more generic drivers for the
> lamobo r1 , and all of above is not necessary . The new approach is
> not to use programs to configure the switch , but to relay on generic
> concepts already in linux such as bridge . So to replicate the above
> basically in the new 4.9 kernel we would do something like :
>
> cat /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/pre-up.d/bcm53125-config
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> # Network and VLAN config for BCM53125 router
>
> /usr/sbin/ip link add br1 type bridge
> /usr/sbin/ip link set dev br1 up
> /usr/sbin/ip link set lan1 master br1
> /usr/sbin/ip link set lan2 master br1
> /usr/sbin/ip link set lan3 master br1
> /usr/sbin/ip link set lan4 master br1
> /usr/sbin/ip link set wan master br1
> /sbin/bridge vlan add vid 2 dev wan pvid untagged
> /sbin/bridge vlan del vid 1 dev wan
> /usr/sbin/ip link set lan1 up
> /usr/sbin/ip link set lan2 up
> /usr/sbin/ip link set lan3 up
> /usr/sbin/ip link set lan4 up
> /usr/sbin/ip link set wan up
>
>
>
> This will set up a config where in my case :
>
> eth0.1 vlanid 1 connects to LAN and has 192.168.1.1 address
> eth0.2 vlanid 2 connects to WAN and has 192.168.0.10 address
>
> I have done some testing of the new method , however have not used
> this in my production environment yet . The author of the switch
> driver has recommended a patch to the dts , as we see here :
>
> The CPU port of the BCM53125 is configured with RGMII (no delays) but
> this should actually be RGMII with transmit delay (rgmii-txid) because
> STMMAC takes care of inserting the transmitter delay. This fixes
> occasional packet loss encountered.
>
> Fixes: d7b9eaff5f0c ("ARM: dts: sun7i: Add BCM53125 switch nodes to
> the lamobo-r1 board")
> Reported-by: Hartmut Knaack<knaack.h at gmx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli<f.fainelli at gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-lamobo-r1.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-lamobo-r1.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-lamobo-r1.dts
> index 72ec0d5ae052..bbf1c8cbaac6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-lamobo-r1.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-lamobo-r1.dts
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@
> reg = <8>;
> label = "cpu";
> ethernet = <&gmac>;
> - phy-mode = "rgmii";
> + phy-mode = "rgmii-txid";
>
> However the patch has not made it yet upstream . SO I am waiting until
> it does .
>
> Having said that I am not sure that I will persist with the lamobo r1
> going forward , and the new kernel would not make any difference for
> me . This is because of the performance envelope of the R1 . As an
> ASDL user the performance is very good , taking into account the small
> power consumption and adequate throughput . However when moving up to
> higher speeds , the R1 will not be able to manage . In my testing with
> iperf the routing starts becoming CPU limited . And it maxes out the
> R1 at about 370 to 400 Mbps . At first this looked OK since I was
> planing to move over to a 100Mbps Cable plan . However my testing
> around 100Mbps showed that R1's throughput starts to decline at about
> 80Mbps, which gets worse as the input increases . So to get 100Mbps
> out , you need to be feeding in about 120Mbps . I guess for my usecase
> I just need a bit more CPU power . Is there an R2 yet?
>
> My current plan is to go up to a board with a J1900 celeron , more
> power consumption unfortunately , but on the plus side a 64 bit intel
> cpu that runs stock Centos 7 .
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Milorad
>
>
> On 25/04/17 03:39, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> It looks from this that he did not get the LAN ports working, only
>> the WAN (eth0)?
>>
>> I believe Fedora25 fully supports the WAN port, the LAN might be
>> another challenge.
>>
>> And what of the R2 quad processor?
>>
>> If I had some more boards, I could test them. But I don't have ready
>> money to buy different boards for different testing :(
>>
>> On 02/26/2017 02:33 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> On 28/02/16 05:40, mo.ucina wrote:
>>>> Hello Guys,
>>>>
>>>> After a bit of fiddling around I found my missing files and copied
>>>> them
>>>> over to /boot . The procedure that I used is as follows (first install
>>>> home-made kernel) :
>>>>
>>>> - yum localinstall kernel*
>>>>
>>>> Then /boot files:
>>>>
>>>> rsync -av /usr/lib/modules/4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl/dtb/
>>>> /boot/dtb-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>> cp /usr/lib/modules/4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl/System.map
>>>> /boot/System.map-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>> cp /usr/lib/modules/4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl/config
>>>> /boot/config-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>> cp /usr/lib/modules/4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl/vmlinuz
>>>> /boot/vmlinuz-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>> dracut /boot/initramfs-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.img
>>>> 4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>>
>>>> /boot dir now looks like this :
>>>>
>>>> root at bananapi /boot # ls -l
>>>> total 87757
>>>> drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 1024 Feb 27 09:17
>>>> 38f5ec9e217b471e8adee477d933f640
>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 171924 Nov 26 00:43
>>>> config-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 176632 Feb 28 05:03
>>>> config-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 15360 Dec 3 14:37
>>>> dtb-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
>>>> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 17408 Feb 27 09:11
>>>> dtb-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 1024 Feb 27 10:33 extlinux
>>>> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 1024 Jan 1 1970 grub
>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 34922581 Dec 3 14:46
>>>> initramfs-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl.img
>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 35844383 Feb 28 05:08
>>>> initramfs-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.img
>>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 592347 Dec 3 14:37 initrd-plymouth.img
>>>> drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 1024 Dec 3 14:44 loader
>>>> drwx------. 2 root root 12288 Dec 3 14:31 lost+found
>>>> -rw-------. 1 root root 2879429 Nov 26 00:43
>>>> System.map-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
>>>> -rw-------. 1 root root 2945068 Feb 28 04:58
>>>> System.map-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 5866104 Nov 26 00:43
>>>> vmlinuz-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
>>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 6032808 Feb 28 05:04
>>>> vmlinuz-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>>
>>>> then modify extlinux.conf :
>>>>
>>>> root at bananapi /boot # cat extlinux/extlinux.conf
>>>> #Created by RootFS Build Factory
>>>> ui menu.c32
>>>> menu autoboot centos
>>>> menu title centos Options
>>>> #menu hidden
>>>> timeout 60
>>>> totaltimeout 600
>>>> label centos
>>>> kernel /vmlinuz-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>> append enforcing=0 root=UUID=9359b607-7331-40ef-98d7-556faebff04d
>>>> fdtdir /dtb-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
>>>> initrd /initramfs-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.img
>>>>
>>>> then reboot:
>>>> systemctl reboot
>>>>
>>>> Once rebooted the new kernel loaded :
>>>> root at bananapi /home/user # uname -a
>>>> Linux bananapi 4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl #1 SMP Sat Feb 27 01:39:09
>>>> UTC
>>>> 2016 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
>>>>
>>>> And the switch driver was detected , from dmesg:
>>>>
>>>> [ 22.138529] b53_common: found switch: BCM53125, rev 4
>>>> [ 22.147309] RX IPC Checksum Offload disabled
>>>> [ 22.154566] No MAC Management Counters available
>>>> [ 22.207713] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready
>>>> [ 22.553164] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready
>>>> [ 22.632139] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
>>>> [ 24.143962] sun7i-dwmac 1c50000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up -
>>>> 1Gbps/Full - flow control off
>>>>
>>>> Because the eth0 was set for dhcp , it automatically came up , since I
>>>> had the Ethernet cable plugged into the "WAN" port :
>>>>
>>>> root at bananapi /home/user # nmcli con
>>>> NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE
>>>> eth0 a19cdd55-f428-40cb-baf7-8c0e9221bc66 802-3-ethernet eth0
>>>>
>>>> root at bananapi /home/user # ifconfig
>>>> eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>>>> inet 192.168.1.166 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
>>>> 192.168.1.255
>>>> inet6 fe80::c7:6ff:fec2:f2eb prefixlen 64 scopeid
>>>> 0x20<link>
>>>> inet6 fdc1:4e49:af09:1:c7:6ff:fec2:f2eb prefixlen 64 scopeid
>>>> 0x0<global>
>>>> ether 02:c7:06:c2:f2:eb txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
>>>> RX packets 537 bytes 46072 (44.9 KiB)
>>>> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
>>>> TX packets 439 bytes 74044 (72.3 KiB)
>>>> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>>>> device interrupt 48
>>>>
>>>> lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
>>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
>>>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
>>>> loop txqueuelen 0 (Local Loopback)
>>>> RX packets 24 bytes 2316 (2.2 KiB)
>>>> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
>>>> TX packets 24 bytes 2316 (2.2 KiB)
>>>> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>>>>
>>>> So here it is R1 is working via the built in port . One further
>>>> clarification : The kernel driver on its own is enough to get the
>>>> Ethernet port working . You do not need anything else . However if you
>>>> want to start using the inbuilt switch for things like VLAN tagging ,
>>>> then you need to have a utility called swconfig . I have used this
>>>> approach in my home router setup to create two virtual interfaces on
>>>> different subnets. This is the only way to do it since we only have
>>>> one
>>>> physical NIC . But more on this later .
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Milorad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Arm-dev mailing list
>>>> Arm-dev at centos.org
>>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>>>>
>>> did the r1 support get rolled into the centos images /kernel ?
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Arm-dev mailing list
>> Arm-dev at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>
More information about the Arm-dev
mailing list