I don't know. These are the kernels RH has chosen for their arm64 platform, I'm matching their decisions and adding enhancements as I can. On 09/06/2017 09:45 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > If I may be so bold to ask, why the seeming preference for non-LT > kernels over LT kernels? Why 4.5 rather than 4.4? Why not 4.9? Why 4.11 > rather than the already available 4.13 which I believe is the next LT > release? > It seems like a lot of necessity for extra work for no benefit and > potentially considerable detriment. > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org > <mailto:jperrin at centos.org>> wrote: > > I've just pushed the 4.11 kernel rebase into git ( > https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=sig-altarch/kernel > <https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=sig-altarch/kernel> ) > > The previous patches included in the 4.5 kernel have been dropped as the > majority either are now included or no longer apply cleanly. Please take > a look at configs listed and submit patches for things you'd like to see > enabled. This 4.11 base will be coming out shortly as part of the > 7.4.1708 build. > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77