Not much going on here (at least on my part), and sadly not a high priority, but it would be nice to have. I know the Fedora guys are working on the whole uboot/efi stuff, so it should be easier there. Once they have everything working in Fedora, it should be easier for us to backport, like we did in the past with much of the armhfp stuff. Pablo El 16/3/19 a las 05:31, Nick Howitt escribió: > What do you get if you don't need perfection? > Also there was a post about UEFI firmware ported to Pi 3/3B+ > platforms. Does this achieve anything to help? I saw someone else > posted about trying to create an aarch64 EFI bootable iso but no one > was able to respond. > > Regards, > > Nick > > On 15/03/2019 16:03, Sayduzzaman Mohammad wrote: >> If anyone need perfection, Simply NO. >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 7:00 AM R C <cjvijf at gmail.com >> <mailto:cjvijf at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> been a while since that topic came up, but is there a centos 64 bit >> version for the Raspberrypi 3(b) ? >> >> thanks, >> >> >> Ron >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev at centos.org> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Arm-dev mailing list >> Arm-dev at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20190316/33f49b2c/attachment-0006.html>