On Mon 27 Sep 2021, 16:35 Jeffrey Osier-Mixon, <jefro at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all - I'd be grateful to get some other voices in the mix. If anyone > has any concerns about Gitlab, please let us know now before any work is > done. Thanks! > Absolutely let's get the conversation flowing, this is all git under the hood so moving things is possible if not with some effort involved. I'd like us to balance that with the need to make a decision and not suffer from analysis paralysis. The main thing for me is getting code open and available for contributions and usage! > > Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon | jefro at redhat.com > Red Hat Office of the CTO | Sr. Principal Community Architect, Automotive > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:14 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:50:22PM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote: >> > Hey everyone, >> > >> > This came up on the call yesterday to open a discussion about where we >> > should host our code and I'd like to open it up here for transparency on >> > the path forward. We have a lot of options in this sphere and all are >> Git >> > based. >> > >> > Historically, CentOS SIGs had their code hosted at >> https://git.centos.org/. >> > That's wired up to the CentOS Account system so users can login >> seamlessly. >> > Some SIGs have opted to host on Github as well and use their own Github >> > profile (which is not connected to their CentOS account). >> > >> > Currently, CentOS Stream is being built in the open at >> > gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream where community contributors can >> create a >> > Gitlab account and interact with CentOS Stream. Gitlab is not currently >> > wired into the CentOS Account system and the team is working to get that >> > integration on the gitlab.com/CentOS project (which is currently >> dormant). >> > >> > The suggestion put forward by Pierre-Yves Chibon, who is leading the >> effort >> > within Red Hat on creating the services and infrastructure for the SIG, >> is >> > to base ourselves on Gitlab. We can create a >> > gitlab.com/redhat/automotive-sig project and mirror it at >> > gitlab.com/centos/automotive-sig so we can show people where we will >> work >> > once we've resolved the authentication question. The drawback is the >> need >> > to use a gitlab.com account, which, in time, we can merge into the >> CentOS >> > Account when the integration is completed. The key benefit of having us >> > base our code on Gitlab is the closeness to Stream from a codebase >> > perspective and the potential to use similar tools and approaches as >> their >> > development workflow. >> > >> > While no formal decision on where the overall CentOS SIGs will host >> their >> > code in the future has been made, the presence of Stream on Gitlab is >> > potentially future proofing us against a migration. >> > >> > Does the community have a strong preference for where we should base our >> > repos? I'm going to suggest we leave this topic percolate for a week to >> > have some dialog on the best path forward and then create our presence >> on >> > the source forge of choice. >> >> A week has passed and there hasn't been any strong preference voiced. We >> have >> checked Smooge's feedback and it looks like gitlab can do migration with >> redirect from the old location to the new one both at the http and the >> git level >> [1] so moving to the centos namespace as soon as it is available should be >> transparent. >> >> So I have asked for the project : >> https://gitlab.com/redhat/automotive/automotive-sig to be created and we >> will >> soon be able to push to it :) >> >> >> Pierre >> >> >> [1] >> https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/repository/index.html#what-happens-when-a-repository-path-changes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-automotive-sig mailing list >> CentOS-automotive-sig at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-automotive-sig >> >> _______________________________________________ > CentOS-automotive-sig mailing list > CentOS-automotive-sig at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-automotive-sig > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-automotive-sig/attachments/20210927/9f44d10c/attachment-0002.html>