On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 09:27 +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
> As there seems to be a desire for official CentOS CS & GFS packages, we
> should decide how these are going to be stored on the mirror.
>
> The simple method is probably directories under {3,4} called {CS,GFS}.
> (ie. new directories alongside extras, centosplus etc).
>
I was thinking a GFS directory (one under 3 and one under 4) and the
$arch, SRPMS, $arch/GFS, $arch/CS under that ... so we can run
createrepo and yum-arch in $arch directory and have one repo (GFS) to
add to users yum configs instead of two. How does that sound? (Since
for CentOS-4 they work together)
> Can these directories easily be shared out to developers? I probably
> need a new key to sign my packages, unless someone with the 3 key wants
> to resign them after I sign then with the 2 key.
>
I don't have a 3 key ... :)
> Given the low volume of updates in these trees, it might be easier if
> someone with 3 access wants to manually take my packages and put them
> into the 3 tree.
>
> Also, how does stuff get into the vault? Is this automatic.
>
I move it to the centos-store in /home on centosa (master) when we kill
a tree, I can setup a centos-2 directory there and give you access if
you want ... or I can mv files if you give me a list. Either way works
for me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20050718/986fbf0f/attachment-0007.sig>