On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:10:16AM +1000, John Newbigin wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > > >I was thinking a GFS directory (one under 3 and one under 4) and the > >$arch, SRPMS, $arch/GFS, $arch/CS under that ... so we can run > >createrepo and yum-arch in $arch directory and have one repo (GFS) to > >add to users yum configs instead of two. How does that sound? (Since > >for CentOS-4 they work together) > I think they should be combined, but RedHat have decided that they are > separate. It is worth adding extra confusion by not doing it 'The Red > Hat Way'? > > If so, perhaps a "csgfs" directory, like the RH docs > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/csgfs/ > I second this idea, the RHGFS need the RHCS ones. The main issue I see is the QA test: how do we compare the CentOS binary rpms against the genuine ones? I can re-sign your rpms, no pb. cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20050719/8dd28d40/attachment-0007.sig>