On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, John Newbigin wrote: > Charlie Brady wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, John Newbigin wrote: >> >>> OK, I have sorted out a new directory structure and tarred it up at >>> http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/csgfs-20050722.tar >> >> The tarball and directory tree doesn't appear to contain source RPMs. Is >> that intentional? > Yes. The SRPMS can be found here: >> //ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/3/en/RHCS/i386/SRPMS/ [etc] My understanding is that RedHat's offering of SRPM is not sufficient for CentOS to distribute binaries. So SRPM should be part of the CentOS directory treee. You mentioned GFS etc for CentOS 4. Do these same SRPMS compile fine on CentOS 4 (I see there's FC4 variants available if not)? Is anyone currently building them on CentOS 4? If not, I'll try to have a go tomorrow. --- Charlie