[CentOS-devel] Re: [CentOS] centosplus and contrib rpms

On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 09:24 +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > 
> > Now there is a Readme.txt in this directory:
> 
> With a capital R?  README or readme.txt would be more common spellings 
> under Unix/Linux.
> 
> The other problem with a single readme file is that it can't be 
> contributed by more than one person, so if a new RPM comes along, the 
> person with the master readme has to edit and upload it.  If the readme 
> was per RPM or set of RPMs then that would not be a problem.  You could 
> also include info like who built the RPM and how to contact them etc.
> 
> README.php
> README.kernel
> etc. could be one way of doing this (in a docs directory?)
> 
> John.

All true ... Here is my {twisted} logic :)

I wanted it at the top of the page ... not it the middle of the
directories ... so a uppercase R does that.  README.txt has special
meaning in Apache ... I don't want it to do what that does.  So
Readme.txt it is

I was going to have a docs directory, but decided to put it in one file
instead.  (I figured it would be easier if it was in the main directory
and in one file).  I am not tied to that concept, so if lots of people
think separate files are better, we can do that.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20050516/1fd1ebde/attachment-0001.sig>