On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 23:03 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > BUT ... this code is still not 100% working with 4K stacks (which all EL > > 4 and FC 3/4/5 kernels currently use). A note from SGI on this code: > > FWIW, I believe only the ia32 kernels have 4KSTACKS turned on... last I > checked Opteron still did not have this option... feel free to correct > me if I'm wrong. You are correct ... I meant x86 (or i386/i586/i686 or ia32 ... whichever term you want to use) for EL4 and FC 3/4/5 > > xfs over normal ide/scsi should be fine w/ 4kstacks; if you start piling > lvm on top of md under nfs etc etc, you could start running into stack > issues with 4KSTACKS. > > > ################################################################# > > # # > > # NOTICE # > > # This xfs module rpm has been provided for testing purposes # > > # only. It is believed to be functional, but it has not been # > > # heavily tested. In particular, you may have issues with the # > > # 4KSTACKS option on RHEL4 ia32 kernels, depending on your IO # > > # hardware, layering, nfs usage, etc. # > > # # > > # Please do NOT report any problems with this module, or with # > > # the kernel when this module is loaded, to Red Hat. # > > # You may report issues to the linux-xfs at oss.sgi.com list. # > > # (Please also report successes!) # > > # # > > ################################################################# > > Just had to cover myself a bit ;-) > > Thanks, > > -Eric Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20051121/a4f87c6f/attachment-0007.sig>