On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 12:56 -0500, Connie Sieh wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Greg Swallow - SkyNet wrote: > > > David Hrbác wrote: > > > I'd like to ask if iptables-devel package is going to be patched by > > > CentOS team to include all header files. Upstream provider still seems > > > to ignore this bug, even it was fixed in FC5. We need to fix it to > > > simplify automatic build of iptables/kernel modules. > > > > I'm cc'd on that bug. Someone from Redhat added this "flag" that is > > invisible on the bug report, but I got this email hinting it may be done for > > 4.5... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: bugzilla at redhat.com [mailto:bugzilla at redhat.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1:08 AM > > To: gregswallow at skynetonline.ca > > Subject: [Bug 178417] missing iportant header files form the devel package > > > > Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional > > comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. > > > > Summary: missing iportant header files form the devel package > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178417 > > > > > > laroche at redhat.com changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Flag| |rhel-4.5? > > > > So does one expect with the new timelines that RedHat has announced that > we will not see RHEL 4.5 for about 6 months? > > -Connie Sieh I'm not sure if those apply starting now or after the 4.5 release when they start the 4.5.0 then 4.5.1 & 4.6.0 then 4.5.2 & 4.6.1 & 4.7.0 ... etc. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20060818/d36d6345/attachment-0005.sig>