Jim Perrin wrote: > On 8/10/06, Greg Swallow - SkyNet > <gregswallow at skynetonline.ca> wrote: >> I just noticed them here >> (http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/i386/RPMS/) >> and looked back and didn't see any note of them on this list. I see they >> are licensed "DLJ 1.1" - this I guess - >> http://download.java.net/dlj/DLJ-v1.1.txt - which surprisingly looks like >> they're legal to distribute (with an operating system). Is that correct? > > DLJ does make it legal to distribute, although it's not open source, ... > Right now they install fine, and work for most things, but a couple ... > Any other info about them you'd like? What's the reasoning for renaming the (jpackage) package name from java-1.5.0-sun to java-1.5.0-centos? Offhand, I'd consider that modification odd/unwise, unless there's some good (but not obvious to me) justification for doing so. -- Rex