David Hrbáč wrote: > Johnny Hughes napsal(a): > > > > Nope ... we build what they provide ... including bugs/ > > Hmm, I'm asking because I have developed yumfirst plugin for Karanbir > and it depends on a function, which is not implemented in centos yum. > Karanbir has been talking about backporting. So are we going to use > backports or not? To backport or not to backport, that's the question. :o) But yum isn't taken from upstream, as they still use up2date, so making changes to yum doesn't really contradict what Johnny said up there. > I guess better way is to provide centosplus iptables-devel package. That probably would be the better way to do it, yes. Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20060821/2efe9785/attachment-0007.sig>