Kevan Benson wrote: > This doesn't really seem to address what I was talking about (or at least > it > doesn't contradict it, the quoted section could apply to everything I > described easily). I'm talking mainly about the default naming convention > in > centosplus of packages that supercede a package in the core package set. > I > included an example of an RPM built against another package in centosplus > because much of this thread has been about addressing how to accomplish > that > in manner that is consistent and intuitive. You have to consider upstream, because they aren't going to add "Obsoletes: php5" to their php packages. My only concern with php-5.1.6 in centosplus is that RHEL5-beta1 is currently using 5.1.4. Sure it's just beta1 and it may change, but if it doesn't that will make for a slightly trickier upgrade for some people at some point in the future. For example the RHWAS php rpm is newer than the RHEL5-beta1 rpm but has a lower version# (5.1.4-1 vs 5.1.4-8). I am sure that is intentional so an upgrade to RHEL5 upgrades php. Greg