[CentOS-devel] kernel-*-devel and yum updates for CentOS-4.x

[Roger Peña Escobio]

--- Matt Hyclak <hyclak at math.ohiou.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:30:04PM +0200, Ralph
> Angenendt enlightened us:
> > Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > -----------------------------------
> > > Note: This is my attempt to solicit input for
> package changes from the
> > > public and not make unilateral decisions and
> push them with only the
> > > developers present.
> > > 
> > > If there is no discussion of this item on this
> list by non-centos
> > > developers, then I will revert back to making
> bug changes based on only
> > > what the developers think :P
> > > 
> > > Therefore, the people who want input into how
> packages are updated need
> > > to speak up.
> > 
> > So where are we now with this bug? Leaving it as
> it is doesn't look like
> > an option, we had so far one person favoring
> changing the kernel and the
> >  rest looks a little bit indecisive :)
> > 
> > So are there any more opinions on this bug
> (especially from non-centos
> > developers?).
> > 
> 
> Changing the default behavior of yum seems to make
> the most sense to me. We
> retain compatibility with upstream and still fix the
> problem for our users.

I am with that option too if the yum mantainer
(jonny?) do not care to carry a yum patch for the rest
of centos4 lives (centos3 do not have that problem? I
do not have anyone to test :-( )

cu
roger

__________________________________________
RedHat Certified Engineer ( RHCE )
Cisco Certified Network Associate ( CCNA )


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business 
(http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com)