On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 20:07 +0200, Milan Ker?láger wrote: > > > I see that there are updates and no lines with reasons in the SPEC file > > (%chagelog). Please include changelog messages to allow track the > > changes and reasons for this (when something breaks for example). Also > > there are a tools for tracking changes in the updated system by emailing > > %changelog changes together with sw updates. > > > > Also there is almost no documentation even FC6 devel tree has a same > > package with a lot more docs: > > > > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.01-1.fc6.noarch.rpm > > > > There is still a question if the "stable" tree of CentOS 4 Extras should > > have latest and greatest package (in compare with FC4 or FC5 tree). > > That is because this is the original release of that package for CentOS > in extras ... there is therefore nothing to change in a changelog. > > It is a first build done of that package ... and I did not use the FC > package. It is a simple repackaging of the CPAN module in a standard > perl template. I was wondering if something was wrong with the RPMforge package, when I noticed that 1.01 was released. So that one will be available from RPMforge shortly as well. Requests for updates can be made via suggest at lists.rpmforge.net Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]