Roger PeXa Escobio wrote: > I am gad you agree-accept that the core developers > learn a lesson :-), I was a litle sad because I could > not see any positive reaction to all our complains and > ideas to get both side happy (just one srpm to give > two packages) you seem mistaken about one thing - there really wasent any real userbase problems with this shift. We had hardly any noise at all from the userbase ( remember there are a _lot_ of people using CentOS directly ). The noise came from only a few people. > I can understand also that you make such a public > change just when another developer speak :-) i dont know what you mean by that. > maybe is an effect of "not everybody's words have the > same weight". I personally agree with that way of > thinking but I beleave if there was one thing that > drive people from whitebox to centos at the begining > was the strong decision control over the whitebox > project that Jonh had and don't want to give away, > Centos promise the opposite. It will be sad that that > promise just demise over time (across consolidation of > the project) again, i dont know what you are trying to imply here. CentOS isnt a one man setup, and all the developers talk to each other just fine. Whitebox is a one man's part time hobby. I dont even understand how you can compare the two. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq