Rex Dieter wrote: >> The CentOS Project provides packages in addition to the packages from >> RH's sources. We need to ensure that these packages are tested in a user >> environment for a while, and only released to the public via the >> mirror.centos.org network once there is some reasonable surety as to the >> functional and bugs situation with the package. > > Instead of blocking on (lack-of) feedback, I'd suggest considering something > like: > 1. Put pkgs in "testing" > 2. If no bugs reported after X days/weeks, move out of testing > > At least this way nothing gets perpetually stalled in testing. we could go one better, and even attach a rule to count number of down loaders. Since dev.centos.org is not mirrored outside that 1 machine we can track the log trivially. but is that something 'enough' to consider a package releasable ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq