--- Matt Hyclak <hyclak at math.ohiou.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:30:04PM +0200, Ralph > Angenendt enlightened us: > > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > ----------------------------------- > > > Note: This is my attempt to solicit input for > package changes from the > > > public and not make unilateral decisions and > push them with only the > > > developers present. > > > > > > If there is no discussion of this item on this > list by non-centos > > > developers, then I will revert back to making > bug changes based on only > > > what the developers think :P > > > > > > Therefore, the people who want input into how > packages are updated need > > > to speak up. > > > > So where are we now with this bug? Leaving it as > it is doesn't look like > > an option, we had so far one person favoring > changing the kernel and the > > rest looks a little bit indecisive :) > > > > So are there any more opinions on this bug > (especially from non-centos > > developers?). > > > > Changing the default behavior of yum seems to make > the most sense to me. We > retain compatibility with upstream and still fix the > problem for our users. I am with that option too if the yum mantainer (jonny?) do not care to carry a yum patch for the rest of centos4 lives (centos3 do not have that problem? I do not have anyone to test :-( ) cu roger __________________________________________ RedHat Certified Engineer ( RHCE ) Cisco Certified Network Associate ( CCNA ) ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business (http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com)