[CentOS-devel] New centos developers 'invitation' -- was: Distribution update and centosplus
R P Herrold
herrold at owlriver.com
Fri Sep 8 03:22:47 UTC 2006
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, David Hrbáč wrote:
> Jim Perrin napsal(a):
>> The CentOS team is quite small and we're working on this for free.
>> Donations of cash, hardware, and talent are welcome to help improve
>> the project.
> ... There's no rule how to became the CentOs developer, as
> far I have not seen any invitation in lists even. I'm trying
> to improve/push Centos with every my post.
I am a bit late into the discussion, but would shed a bit of
light on rules and invitations.
There are many ways that centos is 'developed' (as a rebuild
effort, some but not all of the distribution integration
effort, is pre-ordained -- base and updates package selections
vary from the upstream by and large only as to trademark
elidement and insertion, and updater decisions.) Other places
allow for creativity. A guiding principle is: be a strict and
reliabile rebuild, timely built, striving for stability first,
and added features later, if at all.
Some roles lend themselves to delegation: communication
efforts (mailing list, IRC, forum, wiki, advocacy), testing
(candidates in the testing archive, bugtracker confirmation
and traige), and so forth. Other roles do not - rolling
releases and 'official updates' signed with an official centos
key, infrastructure such as mirror list maintenance or
security matters, web editorial.
The project's needs are assessed, and available 'talent' and
prominent contributors to the project are noted, discussed,
and evaluated on a continuing and continuous basis, by the
centos core team 'behind the scenes.' A few months ago, as a
result of that approach, Jim Perrin was invited to additional
public responsibilities for the project; more recently the
planned EOL and transition of Tao into CentOS, and the
addition of David Parsley occured. Different people,
different skills, but both now part of the core team.
Friendly collaborations with other FOSS projects are part of
Centos' history and a source of its strength.
Each of the core team are active in the project, have their
eyes open, and know who the 'prospects' are, from direct
interaction or published reputation.
So, there _is_ no one 'rule' which one might meet to then
demand admission; rather the project is a self-perpetuating
meritocracy of like-minded people _invited_ and choosing to
volunteer increasing amounts of their time for the betterment
of the project, at increasing levels of responsibility, when
they have demonstrated a competence relevant to a given role.
Want to be a part? you're invited. The quickest routes I can
think of to be invited to assume _more_ responsibility for the
project is to _do_ more; test, participate, be thoughtful and
present and accurate.
The 'entry gateways' are the self-serve account signup routes;
Write reproducable case bug reports when you see a flaw and
propose the fix; weed and confirm existing reports; document
in the forum or the wiki usage cases and solutions for the
topics which recur over and over again in the mailing lists or
in the IRC channels; 'staff' the mailing list and IRC with
good counsel to explain and instruct to answer a tough
question. File reports and push fixes in upstream, not just
up one level, but all the way back up to the underlying wells
of projects from which the FOSS community drinks. We'll
-- Russ Herrold
ps - Think you have what it takes? Want to do more, but you
are shy? If anyone reading this wants to test their mettle out
of the glare of a public participation, but needs a project
suggestion or facilitating resources for a project on behalf
of centos, contact me off list and we'll come to a
specification together to mentor you on, at a complexity level
suited to your skillset. I have an ample backlog of wishlist
tasks on behalf of centos. Some participants have picked up on
suggestions I have described from time to time in the IRC
channel from time to time, and some really nice work _and_
some personal skillset growth in the implementor has resulted
More information about the CentOS-devel