[CentOS-devel] Question re RPM Package Naming
Les Bell
lesbell at lesbell.com.auWed Apr 18 05:23:36 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Question re RPM Package Naming
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Question re RPM Package Naming
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at darkover.org> wrote: >> > Oh, I couldn't do that - modesty forbids, etc. Anyone who needs to know who > to blame will know to use "rpm -qi" to track the packager down. In any > case, that leaves an ambiguity; is the package for the OUP's el5, or CentOS > el5? Since it is not an official package of either of them, it really makes no difference, does it ? << Ah - I guess that answers my question: I thought that the .centos part just indicated that the RPM was built on/for Centos. But if it really means it's an official package, that's an entirely different proposition. >> That is the cannonically correct way to do official packages. But if you are submiting something that will end up in EXTRAS, you don't need to worry about that, since it will most likely require other modifications. << Yes - that was the idea of submitting it via this list. In that case, I can just sit back and relax, since it's somebody else's problem. Thanks! Best, --- Les Bell, RHCE, CISSP [http://www.lesbell.com.au] Tel: +61 2 9451 1144 FreeWorldDialup: 800909
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Question re RPM Package Naming
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Question re RPM Package Naming
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list