Could you give the machine a good solid couple hours of memtest? On 4/26/07, Gernot Stocker <gernot.stocker at tugraz.at> wrote: > On Wednesday 25 April 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > For a test, can you try it without using the MD device. > > > > I repeated the test without md device and I have the same results: > > 1.) Different md5sums for bigger files > > 2.) logprint gives errors > > xfs_logprint /dev/sda4 > xfs_logprint: > xfs_logprint: /dev/sda4 contains a mounted and writable filesystem > data device: 0x804 > log device: 0x804 daddr: 57062880 length: 55720 > > Header 0x2 wanted 0xfeedbabe > ********************************************************************** > * ERROR: header cycle=2 block=822 * > ********************************************************************** > Bad log record header > > > > > Is this on an i386 or x86_64 distro. > > > It is a i386 system and distro: > uname -a > Linux sz-linux02.tugraz.at 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Mon Apr 9 09:46:54 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > I almost can exclude a hardware problem because the machine is working > as image server already for 2 years. Additionally I can repeat the same copy > process onto the same partition/disk formatted with ext3 and the md5sums > are fine. > > Gernot > -- > Gernot Stocker, > Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics(IGB) > Petersgasse 14, 8010 Graz, Austria > Tel.: ++43 316 873 5345 > http://genome.tugraz.at > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > >